First of all, I'd like to remind you that the title of this series of posts is "reasonable expectations." Adding up all the the good arrows (first overall pick, 100+ points in his 17-year old season, almost universal agreement from the "saw him good" crowd that he's the best prospect from this draft year) with the bad arrows (not mature physically, another early contract) and coming out with a reasonable conclusion.
The day Steve Tambellini called his name, RNH was about 150 days younger than Taylor Hall was on his draft day, and I believe that is the biggest down arrow when looking at this young man's NHL chances this fall. On the other side of the ledger is an organization that has shown a willingness to graduate all junior age hockey players capable of posting offense.
My guess is that the Oilers play RNH for 9 games and then keep playing him (save for possibly the WJ's) throughout the schedule. It's a guess, I'm not a mind reader and the Oilers braintrust will have the final say. My prediction is that RNH will not approach 50 points in his NHL debut but will play
- Hall in draft year: 57, 40-66-106 (1.86 ppg)
- RNH in draft year: 69, 31-75-106 (1.54 ppg)
- Who was the last forward who went number one overall to go back to junior? Mike Modano from the 1988 draft. Right around that time Eric Lindros, Mats Sundin and Modano all ended up outside the NHL the year they were drafted. It was 23-25 years ago. Most people point to Modano as the RNH comparable because they both played in the CHL and the Lindros-Quebec bad blood is still so famous. People point to Modano as a guy who had to go back to junior even though he was chosen first overall.
- He wasn't good enough? No, he was certainly good enough to play based on the numbers and the league he played in. There was a contract squabble and he didn't sign in time. He was already back playing for the Prince Albert Raiders by the time the North Stars got him signed.
- I thought he was an American? Yeah, he is. But Modano (and Chelios, and many others) felt the best way to ready themselves for the NHL was the CHL.
- Says you. No, here's an article confirming Modano's reasons for the path he chose.
- So they signed him in December. Why didn't they bring him up? Rules.
- So Modano isn't comparable? No. It's a completely different situation. Modano's reasons for not playing had mostly to do with contract; that was not terribly unusual in that era btw, teams were constantly fighting with their best players and top draft picks over money.
- Well I've seen and heard a lot of people saying that RNH may go back to junior and that's good because it helped Modano. Yeah, I've heard that too.
- You said earlier that sending him back after 9 games was an option. I still think it's an option. Look, I don't think it matters what Minnesota did back then, they weren't run by Hall of Fame managers and that club botched a lot during the 80's.
- Okay, let's talk about your projected numbers. They're not good enough. Hold on a sec, I'll change them. Is 100 points enough?
- Why are they so low. Is it because you're a dink? You asked that question last year.
- Yeah but this time I mean it. Okay, let me take you through my math. His NHLE is 82, 11-27-38 (.463) but I don't think he's going to play every game. The world juniors, watching a few nights from the gondola, I believe he'll miss about 20 games. That would put him (based on NHLE) about 29 points. I gave him a little push because I think the organization will give him a little push.
- He's behind Taylor Hall's numbers. Which I think is fair. I believe we'll be impressed with RNH's wild skills, but the underlying numbers (things like PP/points per 60) won't knock anyone's socks off.
- Who would you compare him too from history? Hmmm. Maybe Robin Yount.
- Why can't you just list some hockey player? Hey, Yount is a good comparable. Articles here, here and here give a nice look at what life was like for Robin Yount 1974 spring. Not terribly different from RNH.
- Did he have a huge rookie season? No. He hit .250, 3 homers and played in 107 games. Made 19 errors. Looked like the bag boy at Safeway all year long.
- You remember him? I had his baseball card.
- So they should have kept him in A ball? I don't think so. He survived and the following season took one giant leap forward.
- So you're saying there's a silver lining? I said this last summer when Taylor Hall's future was being discussed: if the player can clearly play at this level then you keep him and put him in a position to succeed.
- It ruined Sam Gagner. He sucks now. Gagner's fine. If the Oilers hadn't flushed the last couple of seasons and provided support for the Gagner group this team would be farther along. As it is, he's improving despite the roster.
- Where does RNH slide onto the roster? Well, I'd say he'll get very good linemates. Hall-Eberle, Smyth-Hemsky, Paajarvi-Omark or some combination of the three. At a guess I'd say that he and Hall get some time together--maybe with Eberle--and that if the line has success the Oilers will run with it. He'll be a featured player.
- What about faceoffs? What about faceoffs? Horcoff and Belanger are there to take own zone faceoffs, I doubt RNH takes a single important faceoff in his own end for a long, long time.
- Renney likes to roll 4 lines. Renney rolled 4 lines last season because that was clearly the plan. And even then he protected kids when he needed to (look at VandeVelde's late season callup). If they use the Kid Line I mentioned above he'll have to protect them at home and do his best on the road. RNH lining up against the Sedins for an own-zone faceoff won't sit well with the coach I'm sure.
- How can he avoid that matchup? At home no worries. On the road, spot the rookie and perhaps give him a game in the rafters to observe.
- One final question: you have RNH's falling well behind Sam Gagner's rookie numbers. Why? Sam Gagner played 1238 minutes as an NHL rookie. Taylor Hall played 1,004 minutes as an NHL rookie. RNH is going to get around 900 by my estimate. That's a lot of playing time this kid isn't going to get. If he does, then his numbers will be better. This post is trying to find reasonable.
- Reasonable is pretty tough with this team. Amen.
- What don't you want to see? RNH playing in front of subpar goaltending. That would be a crime. He's going to bleed chances, for criminy sakes let's not let him post a -40.

Well put, LT
ReplyDeleteI've been watching tons of video of RNH (there's one on YouTube that shows every shift from a game) and I have to wonder if he's going to get that kind of space to operate in the NHL, at least for his first season.
Last year it was like the defensemen knew if they tried to press him, they'd get burned.
If he does stay up with the Oilers, I suspect he'll take some early licks akin to how Patrick Kane got extra physical pressure during his first year.
The question is how he'll respond. He could go back to junior after 9 games or struggle with the pressure early and then have a rookie-Kane like second half.
I'd send him down. Let him play in Red Deer.
ReplyDeleteI don't think he's going to be a better option then what we have for top 6/PP.
How much influence will the ELC situation have? With Hall, Eberle and MPS all up the same year I have to believe it would be helpful to have a two year gap for RNH rather than just one. Or am I missing something?
ReplyDeleteContract should not be the sole reason for making the decision but I would bet it is a major factor and that RNH gets nine games and then is sent back to shine at WJ's.
Nelson: It makes a lot of sense to stagger the contracts. I don't think it's a major consideration for the Oilers.
ReplyDeleteI do think there's some question about how well the Oilers will do signing all three kids in two years based on what Hall is likely to get.
It's an issue no doubt, but imo there will come a day when the Oilers trade one of those three kids who arrived together last fall.
Lots of the top overall picks haven't exactly torn it up in the NHL in their first year. That's the key point.
ReplyDeleteThey might well have been better off with another year in major junior.
RNH's coach Jesse Wallin (who has his own team's interest to think about) believes the kid could be very well served with another year to get bigger, get more playing time, including killing penalties.
Why are they so low. Is it because you're a dink?
ReplyDeleteI laughed out loud at this line.
You're a fantastic writer, LT.
I think you should fire the insolent jerk that asks you these questions. :P
ReplyDeleteSeriously though, I think as always the reasonable expectations are reasonable.
I've been on the fence as to whether we should keep RNH up or send him back down. I didn't realize how big an age gap there was between he and Hall though. That might be a pretty good reason to send him back.
Guess we'll have to see how this whole 9 game preview plays out before really worrying about it too much.
I keep thinking that of all the years for the Oilers to finish last overall, this was one of the shittiest.
ReplyDeleteRNH's Jr. production just isn't at the same level as Stamkos, Hall or Tavares. I don't think size will be a criterion for staying up. However, looking at his NHLE, I think it is quite possible that his game is not at an NHL level yet.
I don't think staggering contracts is an issue as the contracts already are staggered by one year. I think staggering development is a much bigger consideration. It will be difficult protecting RNH in the line up, given the boatloads of inexperience already there.
Is there any value in considering the best strategy for RNH plus Anton Lander, rather than each on his own?
ReplyDeleteI don't see any fun in having two rookie centres at once. RNH back to junior and Lander to OKC for 2011-2012 would create the problem for next season. Lander in the NHL and RNH in junior this year would ease the transition better than RNH in the NHL and Lander in OKC, in my view.
Shame about the hyphenated name, by the way. I suggest that he drop "Ryan" and change his first name to Nugent. Problem solved!
Verification word Yoctory. Finishing first at the comedy festival.
I really do not think you can compare any player now and be very valid to some player in 1974 (Yount) The game is so much different.
ReplyDeleteI'm hoping RNH posted less than those other young luminaries due to age effect and team effect, and that he really is a prodigy, but I'm not holding my breath. He might be no better than a Gagner (which isn't bad, but it isn't great, either). Now by all accounts, he's a better skater than Gagner, and he has height and reach on him, and may have better hands.... But only Time will tell if the tools tally up.
ReplyDeleteHalfwise, that's an interesting point. If we're not going to develop two rookie centres simultaneously than either one is starting this year or one is not playing for two years.
ReplyDeleteConsidering we don't have a #1 netminder, and only a half-assed Dman I bet the Oil say play'em both and lot, er, eeeeee.
Wallin is going to say it is best for RNH to stay in junior because then Wallin would have the best player in junior on his team again. Not sure he is exactly objective here.
ReplyDeleteI'm thinking RNH and Tambellini have already talked and the plan is to give him his 9 game showcase and then send him back to junior with a mission to dominate.
ReplyDeleteThat should read half-assed D. I'm pretty sure we have more than one half-assed Dman.
ReplyDeleteRNH I've convinced myself will be a sensational player.
ReplyDeleteThat said, it's not much of a stretch to second guess Tambellini sending him down after 9 games, probably before 9 games.
If the Oilers open the season at 7-1-1 he probably stays up, lol.
ELC's are important when you have GOOD players making big money. Right now we have have none.
ReplyDeleteIf/when Hall, Eberle and RNH are making 7+ then the next patch of prospects on ELC's will be important.
If Hall and Co are making 7M on their next contract it will be a good thing... it will mean they actually developed into good players.
I'd certainly rather good players and minimal cap space over bad players and 20M in cap space.
Hunter:
ReplyDeleteI don't think there's a question of talent here. He's a very talented hockey player.
But after 9 games the club will have to make a decision based on how he can quickly acclimate to the NHL level, which few rookies can do. Look at last year - Hall struggled the first few months.
The question for me is how he can stand up to the certain beating he's going to get making similar plays in the corners as he did in Red Deer. If he can handle it, he'd stay. If he can't, back to junior.
Offensive numbers in the NHL would be a bonus.
I agree w/fakepavelbure - send him down to junior's right from the get go.
ReplyDeleteI think that 150 day difference in age between where RNH is and Hall is very significant.
Further, we should get a good read on him in the exhibition season. The early games are such that he'll get a lot of minutes against non-NHL level players. I'll bet h rips it up.
But if he's shut down in the final tune-up or two (when they have to make the decisions), I'd like to see management take the long view about how best to develop rather than force feed him 9 games.
That said, I'd be very surprised if the Oilers don't give him at least 9 given what Stauffer has been saying - and he's usually the mouth piece for management.
The one half of your schizophrenic personality is too hard on the other half. :)
ReplyDeleteWell game 8 is against vancouver and game 9 is against the caps, so expect a couple beat downs.
ReplyDeleteThe ONLY draw back I saw with RNH in the playoffs was when he was being shadowed he had a hard time controlling his emotions and playing within his game. He was completely off his game in the 2nd round of playoffs against a tighter checking team and was beginning to worry about the player yapping in his ear and giving him love taps than trying to make the right play. I think it will take him quite some time to learn how to play with in his realm in the NHL. I don't think RNH right now can play a fast tight checking game where players are giving him cheap shots that the NHL will likely offers.
ReplyDeleteThe Rebels have failed the playoffs each and every year RNH has played for them. He needs to learn how to control his emotions in big games and I hope the Oilers let him play in the WJC to gain that much needed experience.
NHL Rookie seasons for #1 overall forwards since 1993:
ReplyDeleteOvechkin 81GP 52-54-106 (2004)
Crosby 81GP 39-63-102 (2005)
Kane 82GP 21-51-72 (2007)
Tavares 82GP 24-30-54 (2009)
Kovalchuk 69GP 29-22-51 (2001)
Daigle 84GP 20-31-51 (1993)
Stamkos 79GP 23-23-46 (2008)
Hall 65GP 22-20-42 (2010)
Nash 74GP 17-22-39 (2002)
Lecavalier 82GP 13-15-28 (1998)
Stefan 72GP 5-20-25 (1999)
Thornton 55GP 3-4-7 (1997)
I think we can agree only the bottom 3 didn't belong in the NHL their rookie season. Stefan came from the IHL so he didn't have a junior team to go back to. Thornton & Lecavalier have both built strong careers, showing no adverse effects.
With last year's strong rookie crop, RNH also carries none of the burden Lecavalier did to carry the franchise on his shoulders from Day 1.
I believe he should either get sent back within 9 games, or play the entire season (No WJC). Don't burn a year of the ELC sitting for 20-30 games in the pressbox like Thornton.
I thought Stamkos was the best comparison for the numbers Hall would put up last year. For RNH I would say Nash is the closest.
My prediction:
70GP 13-25-38
ReplyDelete19. It ruined Sam Gagner. He sucks now. Gagner's fine. If the Oilers hadn't flushed the last couple of seasons and provided support for the Gagner group this team would be farther along. As it is, he's improving despite the roster.
Its arguable that the managements incompetence to bumble their way to 30th place back to back, has put the team further down a longer highway than any support for Gagner could have done.
I don;t give them any credit for putting us in 30th. It wasn't their plan obviously, but I do give them credit for recognizing the position they are in now, suffering a couple painful seasons in order to build the future, rather than flush the roster with stopgap support too soon. I personally would have waited 1 more season, when the kids are a bit more ready, to call in the infantry, but there is enough talent in the system now that another 1st overall isn't essential.
I'll just frame it this way, the Edmonton Oilers are in a much better position to be successful through the next decade now, rather than building around Gagner/Cogliano. Now the key is for Katz to ensure the right guys are at the helm of the ship. I'd imagine he atleast suspects otherwise right now. One would hope.
Rich: "I agree w/fakepavelbure - send him down to junior's right from the get go."
ReplyDelete---
Are you serious? You don't want the best prospect outside the NHL to play 9 NHL games against professional men so he can go back to the WHL knowing EXACTLY what he needs to work on? That's asinine and a complete waste. If management did this they would be the joke of the league.
The fault I just explained about RNH is exactly why he needs his 9 games and why he needs to play in big games that the WJC will offer. This is where his game needs to grow.
Hall was 2-3-5 -4 in his first 9 games. All but one assist came in games 8 and 9.
ReplyDeleteLT, care to do a RE projection for RNH's first 9 games?
ReplyDeleteI'm thinking if he plays with Hall and Eberle, he won't be going the first 7 games with only one assist will he?
we are questioning weather RNH should spend another year in junior. Heck Yeah! here is one of the main reasons.
ReplyDeleteWhen you look at some of the october to Feb drafted players they were playing there 18 year old season in there draft year.
there 17 year old season came the year before. IE. Taylor hall was 17 in the 09 draft year.
therefore by the structure of the draft taylor hall played an extra year in the CHL. he was 19 years old this year.
This point is the most obvious yet ignored.
Look at 1.4ppg or better players in there 17 year old CHL season in the nhl since 2000.
2011:
Strome[1.63], Hubredeau[1.5], Yakupov[1.55], RNH[1.53].
2010:
Couterier[1.41], Seguin[1.68], Skinner[1.42], Weal[1.42]
2009:
E. Kane[1.57], Hall[1.43], Ellis[1.56]
2008:
Tavares[2.00], Stamkos[1.72]
2007:
Gagner[2.23], Voracek[1.46], Couture[1.44]
2006:
C. Giroux [1.44]
2005:
Ryan[1.44],Bernier[1.42]
2004:none
2003:
P, Osullivan[1.45]
2001:
Hemsky[1.47], PM bouchard[1.42], Spezza [2.07}, wellwood[1.74], weiss[1.40]
From this the players that played there 18 year old season in the NHL. (5)
Seguin,
Skinner
E. Kane
Stamkos
Gagner
Stamkos and Skinner, goal scorers, benefitted some of the games best set-up men. Staal and St. louis.
-we know Yakupov will be in the CHL,
- A yashin signing keeps strome in CHL one more
- I think florida put hubredeau in nhl
- I would not rush RNH based on history. Plus NHLE and skill set says he will not be better than Gagner, Hemsky, Horcoff, Belanger.
I feel a whole lot better about 18 year old RNH enetering the NHL
-bigger,
-Faster,
-Shooting more
-2.0+ppg
-higher EV PPG rate.
Oh yeah! one more YEAR!
In the Grease,
ReplyDeleteI'd imagine that RNH will get plenty of PP time in pre-season and in the early part of the year. I don't think his points per 60 number will impress but the boxcars will be there.
I'd guess 1-3-4 after 9.
Somebody tell Tambellini to throw a one year overpay at Hannan right now. Guy has to be getting desperate soon. Edmonton will give him top 4 minutes playing with Gilbert or Whitney to showcase his game for free agency next year.
ReplyDeleteThen sign a Euro goalie with an outside chance of being at least averagish to play with Dubnyk and try for the playoffs.
Scott Hannan:
ReplyDeleteQC: -0,014 (4th behind 3 kids)
QT: -0,042 (5th)
Corsi REL: -0,9
+-on/60: -0,09
PDO: 992
(I guess shooting for 2% doesn't help)
He's okay. Wouldn't overpay tough.
27. why do you keep mentioning Robin Yount?
ReplyDeletebecause I really like moustaches and I found him to be more attractive then Paul Molitor!!
I really do not think you can compare any player now and be very valid to some player in 1974 (Yount) The game is so much different.
ReplyDeleteThis made me laugh. Yes, the game is very different.
When you field a badly balanced roster, you're handing the opposing coach carte blanche to lavish abuse with impunity on any point of weakness.
ReplyDeleteThis season, there might be a downside to overplaying the body on RNH to grind him down: he's likely to be surrounded by young legs with elite hands, likely to snag a rushed pass more often than not.
This team is going to be hard to play and easy to beat. Inexperience will show up in how regularly they snatch defeat from the jaws of victory, when defeat fails to pour itself through giant holes in the save percentage.
RNH is going to have to learn (quickly) to play without the saucer pass of perfection. His emergency backhand shovel pass between the legs while turning away from a crushing hit should be on par with any pass emanating from JFJ after his coverage took a spill on a rut at center ice, according to every scouting report I've read. That's why we picked him, isn't it?
If JFJ was likely to find himself on the receiving end of RNH's emergency shovel, the opposing coach would pour himself a pregame Margarita.
But no, it's more likely to be Hall or Eberle, neither of whom lack *any* experience in pouncing on a loose puck skittling across a scoring zone.
Inexperience will show up from time to time when the skittling puck jumps over their stick and the play heads the other direction faster than Patrick Stephan can crane his neck as our hustling forwards (good) try to coordinate with our collapsing D-men (not good).
Hopefully the era where we iced an apple turnover on every line are ancient history now.
There might be enough of a downside on overplaying the body against a kid with pinball reflexes and no blindside to make the opposing coach reconsider his pregame Margarita. "Well, when we pressure RNH, the puck might immediately squirt to Taylor Hall. OK then, but have no fear, he's inexperienced, tends to bobble the puck, and even if he doesn't, he's easy to push out of the paint." Shakes head. Whoa, I'm drinking too much. Better save that bottle for the Ontario leg.
Thanks LT... certainly sounds reasonable. I'm going to go boldly optimistic with 9gp, 1-4-5. lol.
ReplyDeleteEven 1-3-4 would have to be considered a strong start, and would likely keep him on the team.
Will touch base with you after those first 9...
Rick,
ReplyDeleteConsidering RNH's undersized to play pro sports, and the consensus appears that he's almost certain to play in Red deer next season; especially considering another Oiler roster player in Gilbert Brule, who's career potential has been nuked by too-much-too-soon major injuries.
I think most people feel he'll get 9 games and then they'll evaluate. We'll see, but that would be my guess.
ReplyDelete@hunter1909
ReplyDeleteI'm not sure about any consensus.
He would have to crap the bed very, very bad in preseason to not get nine games and pretty bad in his nine games to not stick, imo.
RNH will be the same height as Hall but he will be about 20 lbs lighter to start camp this fall then what Hall was in his first year. There is no doubt about the talent but is he going to get enough ice time to keep developing if he plays at the NHL level. No need to rush him especially when there is still things for him to conquer at the junior level. Let him develop physically & garner a ton of confidence!
ReplyDeleteWow. Redundant verbosity waving the bright orange flag of "please look at me."
ReplyDeleteHockey by Hemingway.
My point wasmeant to point out the cut off date flaw for the draft. end of june should be the cut off. All will have turned 18 by the draft.
ReplyDelete@Rickibear: I believe the reason for the weird cutoff date of Sept. 15 is that all will have turned 18 by the opening of training camp. In fact since camp starts pretty much right on the that date every year, ALL newly drafted (first-time-eligible) players will be 18 at their first camp.
ReplyDeletei realize one year playing sheltered minutes in the NHL can have a solid impact on the growth of a player based on what you said LT. But I wonder if one year dominating junior and the world juniors, followed by a solid memorial cup run doesn't have the same impact. Eberle got sent down and I'm not sure if he would have been further along then he is right now had he spent his first year in the bigs.
ReplyDeleteLet either Brule or Lander or Vandevelde get some run. We are not making the playoffs this season (as you have pointed out numerous times in part largely to the question mark in goal). So why waste an entry level contract year on RNH.
I still stick to my belief that Lander will outperform RNH in training camp, and make the Oil decision easier, allowing us to have an all swede line for the first time in Oilers history. it will be glorious!
Bruce: Yeah, I think the rule has something to do with the NHL protecting itself against lawsuits ala Linseman and Tonelli.
ReplyDeleteDBO: I think it's a fair question but would argue that RNH is a superior offensive prospect to Eberle and therefore their paths may be different.
@LT: Yes that would be at the nub of it, for sure. They didn't want some 18-year-old kid shrieking "restraint of trade" or whatever, and they didn't want any underagers getting hurt at camp either, so they set a "weird" date that coincides with the start of camp.
ReplyDeleteThey also seem to be careful about giving 18-year-olds a reasonably fair crack at making the team which may also be grounded in covering their legal asses. All this talk on the 'sphere about sending guys back to maximize their ELC regardless of whether they are good enough to be NHLers right away never seems to account for that aspect.
If he is going back to Junior I think you still have to give him the 9 games even if it's a foregone conclusion that he's being sent down. That's $98,000 in his pocket for the 9 games, no small chunk for an 18 year old, a nice favor to the guy and a small positive gesture toward the player.
ReplyDeleteLT and Bruce:
ReplyDeleteMaybe some of the lawyers here can shed some light, but my understanding is there is no legal reason the NHL HAS to have an 18 year old draft, provided the terms of the draft are covered by the CBA.
In the NFL, you need to be 3 years post high-school to be draft eligible. In the NBA, you need to be 19 and one year removed from the graduation of your high school class
I should clarify, those used to be the rules in the NFL and NBA, both could well change as both league are currently without a CBA (although it sounds like the NFL might be close to ending it's work stoppage).
ReplyDeleteRNH's future is so murky because there are so many more factors to consider than with Hall last year.
ReplyDelete1- big enough? Hall certainly was, RNH is light but tall and could likely get knocked about
2. Ability? Hall had it in spades, so does RNH, but likely not at the same level of demonstrable outcomes
3_ Contracts? Nobody in the Oilers management considers this, so I don't see it as much of a factor, for either Hall or RNH.
4)Roster space? There is an abundance of options for centre on the bottom two lines that did not exist a year ago, making RNH much less critical to keep around, compared with Hall on LW last year.
V. Development? The Oilers may actually care about this facet of the game now, so it is reasonable to see it as a consideration for RNH. Hall didn't need it, as he was the shiny bauble to begin with and demonstrated his ability to stay up once that wore off.
The long and the short of it, there is a lot to consider (and I didn't even list half) when seeing RNH this fall. And I don't think his performance will be the only consideration that plays into keeping him up or sending him back.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteIt has to boil down to what is best for RNH's development. We all worried that Hall would get hurt last year and this year the concern is the same for RNH (although albeit different reasons).
ReplyDeleteI'm betting the kid stays. He was the best prospect in the world last year. He was a different class because of his ability to think the game. IMO its better for his development to play/practice with players like Hall, Eberle, Hemsky, Horcoff, Smyth. The sooner he can think the game at the NHL level the better.
Many would argue he already can.
I don't know why we're so worried about what we're going to do in 2 years when 4/91/14 are due for new contracts.
ReplyDeletePaajarvi will be behind Hall and Smyth this year, and then behind Hall (and possibly Smyth) in 2012/13. Why are we expecting him to put up numbers that will warrant a $7M+ contract? Eberle's rookie year was very comparable to Gagner's (who was 2 years younger at the time), and his 2nd contract was just over $2M. Hall...ok, he's probably going to get paid.
A lot can happen in 2 years, and even more can happen in 3 or 4 when RNH is going to need a new deal. If Nugent-Hopkins is ready, then he should play regardless of his contract situation.
And if the plan is to keep them in Oiler colours long term, then they're going to have to find a way to have them all on the team in their 2nd and 3rd contracts at some point anyway.
There's no restraint of trade issue once the players unionize, so as speeds points out, age 18 is somewhat arbitrary. My understanding is this is the reason why the NFLPA blew up their union - it gave them one more legal stick to wave around.
ReplyDeleteYou obviously wouldn't want to go any lower, though, as the kids should be 18 when they sign their ELC.
Misfit:
ReplyDeleteThe cap should be in the stratosphere in 3 years if this offseason is any indication.
We have a deep-pockets owner, so maybe we shouldn't worry so much about who the Oilers will need to deal to stay under the cap in 2014.
I'm much more concerned about Hall and Eberle not falling back in year two, like so many other young players.