Monday, December 27, 2010

Oilers Recall Petry


















The Edmonton Oilers have recalled D Jeff Petry from Oklahoma City of the AHL. Petry was taken in the 2006 Entry Draft by the Oilers and joins Theo Peckham who was taken later in the same draft. Petry has all the tools: size, speed and puck moving ability are his calling cards.

We've discussed Jeff Petry a lot on this blog. If he emerges as a solid two-way NHL defenseman the Oilers will have gone a long way to solving their gaps along the blue. With Peckham already at the NHL level, and men like Plante on the way, things could be looking up for the Oilers at the position.

Petry showed well at training camp this fall, but the organization was cautious in light of the Taylor Chorney development fiasco (Chorney was elevated too soon with predictable results).
  • Tom Renney at training camp 2010: "We have to make sure--even with a player who has been very impressive here--as more of an adult looking player here at this camp; Jeff is not an NHLer today. It's not the wrong thing for us to make sure he goes to Oklahoma City, so he can get a feel for the physical nature of the game. We can expect too much of this player who is so good in so many areas, and then three months from now we're saying 'what happened?' Well let's not go there."
Tom Gilbert didn't skate today and Jim Vandermeer isn't healthy either. What does this mean? Jeff Petry will make his NHL debut tomorrow night. I wonder if his Dad (former Detroit Tigers pitcher Dan Petry) can make it on time.

32 comments:

  1. Looking forward to an end to end rush (preferably ending in a goal.

    ReplyDelete
  2. He may never see the AHL again.

    Good luck Mr. Petry!!

    Anyone know exactly what happened to 77's knee?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Good for Petry. It'll be nice to get a chance to see how he plays in the NHL.

    ReplyDelete
  4. At the end of a period where Petry gets an assist, Gene Principe is going to say ...and Jeff Petry dishes the puck over to Hall for the goal (followed by a wink).

    Book it!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Stupid management keeps giving me reasons to watch the games.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm curious, since Chorney had such a short stint in the NHL, why is that considered to have damaged him?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Any predictions on what happens when Hemsky returns to the lineup tomorrow? Will we be relieved of 22 or will Omark go back to OKC?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Woodguy mentioned in the last thread that TSN has Vandermeer on the IR.Don't see anything as official on the Oiler website so I can't say for sure.
    Perhaps it's one of those emergency callups because the cupboard is bare in terms of D on the active roster.

    Looking forward to Petry-I think/hope he as top 4 upside.It sure would be nice if we had another of our D prospects take steps towards the NHL this season(I'm counting Peckham as having made the jump)

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hopefully Gilbert can go tomorrow. Petry played with Whitney in preseason and looked really good (then again, both Vandermeer and Strudwick looked half decent with #6 as well). It'd be nice to see him slide into that spot and keep the Petry/Gilbert combo together.

    ReplyDelete
  10. LT- at this rate your summer list is going to be half newbies. ;) Hall, Eberle, Paajarvi, Peckham, Dubnyk.

    And now Omark and Petry.

    Would hope they keep Linus up in the top nine. I'd rather him than Brule.

    Petry will probably get just a cup of coffee but next season I would bet he earns a spot unless he goes off the rails here.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Pretty excited about this. I don't expect him to make a big impact, but I'm happy he'll be in the lineup. I've been following him for a bit now and watched him in a handful of games so far. There are holes there, such as his wandering in the D-zone, but I think he'll be solid once he figures it all out. I don't think he'll be up for long, but NHL game #1 is always exciting though.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Misfit- God let's hope so. If Petry can step in and then you have 49/77 then its Smid and Foster as your bottom pair. Seems about right.

    Don't know if Peckham is the answer longterm as a top 4 D but procurement has added Hall, Eberle and Paajarvi as top nine forward to Hemsky, Penner, Horcoff and Gagner. If Omark can do it too (I believe he can) then you need a centre in your top nine and a fourth line with some role players who can PK (and a centre who can win draws).

    And suddenly you have a reasonable looking club.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Speaking of promising young D:
    Marincin: 2PIM, +1, 4SOG in a 2-1 win over Germany.

    Roy gets the nod vs CZ tomorrow, then Visintine vs the easiest opponent in Norway, which seems to suggest Roy vs the Swedes on the 31st as long as he doesn't crap the bed vs CZ. Good news.

    Really interested to see Marincin against the big boys tomorrow.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Question: are the same bunch that reasoned the Oilers are somehow better-off without Hemsky and Horcoff in the lineup going to use that "logic" to conclude that Gilbert being out is also a positive?

    My guess: probably.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Question: are the same bunch that reasoned the Oilers are somehow better-off without Hemsky and Horcoff in the lineup going to use that "logic" to conclude that Gilbert being out is also a positive?

    No, they will use an entirely different variety of flawed logic to reach that conclusion. While Hemsky is obviously one of our best forwards, his being out helps the team because it forces it to stop relying entirely on him doing the same ineffective thing over and over. Gilbert being out will help the team because any AHL call-up is an automatic improvement over him.

    That's my understanding of the theory, anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  16. @ Gerta Rauss,

    Oh yeah thanks! That's right, the Oilers didn't call up a player when Vandermeer went down. I have holiday brain right now. :p

    ReplyDelete
  17. The anti-Gilbert argument involves #77 being a Nancy boy who lacks toughness. This makes him useless. MacIntyre played some D, maybe he can draw in?

    ReplyDelete
  18. @Bad Wojo:

    Basically, Chorney's shot at the bigs was damaged because he was placed with Strudwick basically his entire time in Edmonton, playing tough competition and getting absolutely destroyed night in and night out. He played 42 games in Edmonton last year, had 3 assists and no goals, and finished at -21 on the year. He was also -20 in Springfield, probably because they were a gongshow, too, but he may have been a contributor to said gongshow. In three years of NCAA, he put up 3-15-18, 8-23-31, and 3-21-24, so there may be a player there, and he's 1-9-10 and +2 so far this year, so he might turn it around yet. But the Oilers took him from their development system, which was crap until recently, and threw him in the deep end with an anchor (Struds) and expected him to swim. He sank pretty hard and there were concerns about doing the same thing to Petry.

    ReplyDelete
  19. There's also evidence the Oilers threw him into the deep end in Springfield as a raw rookie too. The crazy thing is his numbers were miserable and they kept playing him against the tougher compeition.

    All the while Kevin Prendergast is singing Sunshine, Lollipops and Rainbows.

    I think it's one of the reasons he got fired.

    ReplyDelete
  20. This reply is only vaguely related to anything but...

    Since everyone (media, fans, etc.) seems to know better, I have this tendency to defend the people in charge. I trust that they're professionals and got there more or less by skill. Politics always plays a part, but any competitive entity has to elevate its best or sink.

    Then I think about Kevin Lowe's offer sheet to Thomas Vanek, or the drafting under Prendergast and I have serious doubts. The only way to allay those doubts is to think "well, we don't keep track of the suggestions the Sun sports section makes"... and even if we did, it's one thing to suggest something, it's quite another to actually do it with millions of dollars and the future of a franchise on the line.

    Comments? I'm just curious how everyone else feels.

    ReplyDelete
  21. is there a point where we start to view our "assets" more like the NFL...is it really a big deal if we waive brule and he's picked up?

    in the NFL they would view it as "clearing space" so you can fill that space with something you want.

    or do we hang onto brule for a full year and hope that at some point we get a 5th? sure stu is good, but is a 5th (or whatever we get) worth that wait, or worth what we're fielding?

    i just watched the oil change series again with my dad -- he'd never seen them. the whole souray part really confused him. asset mgt on this team is confusing, is all i responded.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Jfry- I would bet that 13 gets dealt and Brule gets the Nilsson/POS treatment next summer. If Omark is a player then that's 8 of a top 9 forwards and they will fill that 9th spot with another kid or a signing.

    13 has been running in place for years now and 67 looks lost. Much like the aforementioned and Pouliot and Potulny they've been found wanting. I would guess that JFJ and Stortini are going to get flushed too.

    Bad Wojo- well I would point to Doug MacLean or Mike Milbury. Going outside of sports you can look at the bright boys who destroyed the economy, Enron and so on. Or history which gives us Sir Douglas Haig.

    That argument makes me crazy. He is in charge ergo he knows better and should be trusted. Could I GM an NHL club? No. But I would lay money that there are plenty of folks who could do a better job than ST or Lowe. After they signed Khabibulin a whole lot of folks pointed out the obvious stupidity of it. It doesn't take a rocket scientist.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Black Dog: I think Cogs is on a 1 year deal. I know they don't like to let "assets" walk for nothing, but if Omark continues to show, they will have to make hard decisions on Cogs - and possibly Brule/Fraser.

    They still need that elusive 3C, but do you bring in Lander and Omark and let Cogs walk then gas one of Fraser/Brule? Or maybe find a partner at the trade deadline?

    ReplyDelete
  24. I dunno. I think some fans could do better then some of the chucklef***s that fill front offices on NHL clubs.

    Nepotism at it's worst.

    Look at Vancouver. They got rid of their tambellini after one season. (Nonis) and then went "outside" the box and got a forward thinking agent to run the team. Guys like Lowe gave him a hard time when he took on the job, but it worked out anyways.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Here is my scenario if I was GM.

    Me: "All right guys we need a checking center who is out there?"

    Ass GM LT: "Well Malholtra is available."

    Me: "Great let's sign him."

    Ass GM LT: "He'd rather play for Vancouver."

    Me: "Well that's that. Let's get some lunch!"

    ReplyDelete
  26. Most fans talk a good talk when it comes to managing, but their efforts would die a quick, messy death if they ever got put in the big chair. The weight of responsibility, the pressures of dealing with the owner and upper management, the sheer scope of the multitasking requirements, the media responsibilities, the constant criticism from bloggers&media (no matter what you do, I might add)...

    It would be hilarious to watch some of the folks here who think all they need to do is data mine a stats sheet and make decisions in a vacuum.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Ha ha yeah dude. There is a lot of assessing to do.

    ReplyDelete
  28. What do you think these statheads would do, Magister, spend to the cap and still finish 12 points back of 29th?

    I do think there's a tendency among some people to forget that being an NHL GM isn't the same as playing East Side Hockey Manager - besides making player personnel decisions, there are the actual negotiations to conduct, a scouting department to run, budgeting to be done, a corporate culture to develop, probably some marketing stuff (I'm not sure to what extent Tambellini's involved in Laforge's territory)...it's probably fair to say that, hilarious Mike Winters comics aside, Tambellini hasn't just been hanging out at the Kingsway food court since calling in the one player personnel decision to be made every two weeks or so. Maybe he's good in the room.

    But on a straight matter of hockey personnel decisions? I have no doubt that a lot of people in the Oilogosphere could have outperformed the Oilers front office in the summer 2006 to summer 2010 period. Again, while apparently trying to put together a winner (the rebuild doesn't appear to have started until late last season at the earliest), these guys instead wound up with a cap team finishing 29th. That is nothing short of magnificent.

    ReplyDelete
  29. LT: would 77 be a Petry-comparable?

    I'm really looking forward to seeing this kid because if he was just a bit younger we'd all be ultra-excited.

    ReplyDelete